{"id":"W2124153207","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.023","title":"Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"American Heart Journal","topic":"Vascular Procedures and Complications","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1071,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton Health Sciences; McMaster University; Population Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Randomized controlled trial; Myocardial infarction; Internal medicine; Fluoroscopy; Cardiology; Stroke (engine); Radial artery; Meta-analysis; Percutaneous; Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2117583577492151,"score_gpt":0.4809725693902439,"score_spread":0.2692142116410288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}