{"id":"W2124205318","doi":"10.1142/s0218195902000979","title":"DIAMONDS ARE NOT A MINIMUM WEIGHT TRIANGULATION'S BEST FRIEND","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Computational Geometry & Applications","topic":"Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Minimum-weight triangulation; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Triangulation; Point set triangulation; Graph; Time complexity; Pitteway triangulation; Constant (computer programming); Point (geometry); Set (abstract data type); Discrete mathematics; Delaunay triangulation; Bowyer–Watson algorithm; Geometry; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005322635,0.0002882752,0.0003655266,0.001497505,0.0002704974,0.0004380356,0.001832359,0.0001252692,0.0003547485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001499483,0.0002942861,0.0003356257,0.001681662,0.00009772001,0.001378666,0.0002175429,0.000341305,0.0003489334],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002146029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001574781,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002718714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001415575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960637,0.0001127588,0.001218904,0.0004609594,0.001853028,0.0002906507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945868,0.0007309276,0.00128105,0.0003555579,0.002774476,0.0002712414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001092734,0.002599548,0.001741511,0.00003804866,0.0008666292,0.0001247844,0.0006904147,0.2893561,0.000735695,0.1976343,0.01634227,0.4897614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00469683,0.0003852043,0.01422926,0.0001274063,0.0001313623,0.001429872,0.0001378242,0.3313995,0.001375604,0.09413566,0.5508798,0.00107169],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01046847,0.001051509,0.9783695,0.006763384,0.001190467,0.0003613243,0.00006230118,0.00007630142,0.001656738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8709615,0.0001381194,0.1244686,0.0009959921,0.00220218,0.0001026774,0.00007654758,0.0000251783,0.001029176],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8604931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02225489005613522,"score_gpt":0.2738408414536223,"score_spread":0.251585951397487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}