{"id":"W2124234222","doi":"10.1109/lpt.2006.870085","title":"Estimating intensity fluctuations in high repetition rate pulse trains generated using the temporal Talbot effect","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Photonics Technology Letters","topic":"Advanced Photonic Communication Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Talbot effect; Pulse (music); Optics; Multiplication (music); Amplitude; Repetition (rhetorical device); Intensity (physics); Pulse wave; Limit (mathematics); Train; Physics; Computer science; Mathematics; Laser; Acoustics; Mathematical analysis; Diffraction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001069956,0.0004086414,0.0002457394,0.0005569071,0.0002768615,0.0004343894,0.0005733193,0.0004808607,0.0003656308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003810785,0.0002556067,0.0001678685,0.000401556,0.0005830331,0.0007059523,0.0004384364,0.0004713602,0.0001167547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004502372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002876541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007441076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008268912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994648,0.0001109764,0.00002050865,0.00009720598,0.0002611498,0.00004531249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985343,0.0008536314,0.0002836365,0.0001201956,0.0001534598,0.00005477634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003732302,0.0001215109,0.007970928,0.0001184966,0.00004803959,0.0003115478,0.0001926244,0.1622953,0.7718771,0.01263279,0.0001880914,0.04387043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001577195,0.000174027,0.006945086,0.00001176249,0.00001828173,0.000200927,0.00002933184,0.6439277,0.3447791,0.003518011,0.0003307635,0.00004915543],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4913365,0.00018874,0.5060114,0.0001023014,0.00001088871,0.00004267875,0.00005763667,0.0003504856,0.001899312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9359816,0.0001176293,0.06332787,0.00002955635,0.00001026381,0.00003449423,0.00005029998,0.00003446582,0.0004137963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001069956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005658567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00989418955110959,"score_gpt":0.2369819396541115,"score_spread":0.2270877501030019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}