{"id":"W2124417421","doi":"10.1186/1746-4269-8-16","title":"Diversity of use and local knowledge of wild edible plant resources in Nepal","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine","topic":"Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":224,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"WWF Nepal; University Grants Commission","keywords":"Biodiversity; Ethnobotany; Geography; Food security; Threatened species; Agroforestry; Traditional knowledge; Crop; Cash crop; Socioeconomics; Habitat; Agriculture; Ecology; Biology; Medicinal plants; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001094948,0.0001009365,0.000500623,0.00004679905,0.0001083608,0.000001167999,0.0001052693,0.0001571493,0.00002572223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002923289,0.00003586144,0.00004268393,0.0001589628,0.0008335193,0.00012192,0.0002615925,0.0003166565,3.217313e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008140812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005954927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005645988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007085404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990762,0.0001019602,0.0004219141,0.00009082534,0.00009778575,0.0002113161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983462,0.001132009,0.0002696951,0.00002562099,0.00008938646,0.0001370529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004924944,0.0002020606,0.9386246,0.00005946021,0.0000579004,0.000009647475,0.006861106,6.056661e-7,0.03559549,0.00007150331,0.0003431479,0.01768204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006726058,0.001502814,0.9861847,0.0002820119,0.00005012392,0.00009682048,0.006805344,0.000004688158,0.0005913517,0.0002058288,0.003529885,0.00007382071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888603,0.009640742,0.000003950689,0.001149958,0.0001892171,0.00004685187,0.00001297728,0.000002405929,0.00009355941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972583,0.00230214,0.00003377249,0.0001155424,0.0002573346,2.817105e-7,0.000002437727,4.519326e-7,0.00002975336],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04756016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3071136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05646872449694819,"score_gpt":0.2600101671831564,"score_spread":0.2035414426862082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}