{"id":"W2124417421","doi":"10.1186/1746-4269-8-16","title":"Diversity of use and local knowledge of wild edible plant resources in Nepal","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine","topic":"Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":224,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"WWF Nepal; University Grants Commission","keywords":"Biodiversity; Ethnobotany; Geography; Food security; Threatened species; Agroforestry; Traditional knowledge; Crop; Cash crop; Socioeconomics; Habitat; Agriculture; Ecology; Biology; Medicinal plants; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000429069,0.0001260014,0.0001536643,0.001110723,0.0008556112,0.0008869506,0.0003112155,0.0002549491,0.002414923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001378624,0.0001379211,0.00006872387,0.0009126389,0.000731335,0.001141781,0.001030819,0.0002745389,0.0001490609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004583968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004746366,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00815616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01847595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997764,0.00007324445,0.00001816714,0.00004359052,0.00003800988,0.00005065991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990257,0.0005129247,0.0002332244,0.00002534126,0.00008707059,0.0001157759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006227939,0.000105424,0.781746,0.0003764222,0.00003180392,0.00256787,0.1664598,0.0001159172,0.002693628,0.0006566047,0.0003511627,0.04483304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004266161,0.0002053308,0.8673271,0.0002506333,0.00002461179,0.002303794,0.124657,0.0003782311,0.0003889466,0.0003866441,0.004045397,0.00002822239],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985307,0.0001228816,0.00003300784,0.00005094463,4.940304e-7,0.000004160127,0.00004031105,8.573763e-7,0.001216604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999415,0.0002098541,0.00007041103,0.00002148771,6.384632e-7,0.000007959376,0.00002918015,4.280892e-7,0.0002451114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00815616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01621735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05646872449694819,"score_gpt":0.2600101671831564,"score_spread":0.2035414426862082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}