{"id":"W2124518380","doi":"10.1109/apsec.2000.896710","title":"A comparative evaluation of techniques for syntactic level source code analysis","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Parsing; Computer science; Programming language; Syntax; Source code; Abstract syntax tree; Code (set theory); Software; Artificial intelligence; Simple (philosophy); Natural language processing; Abstract syntax; Set (abstract data type)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01555972,0.002233337,0.001642174,0.01104229,0.001042591,0.003083222,0.004235942,0.003165069,0.003229722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05263061,0.001082178,0.002566741,0.0103799,0.001220099,0.007009589,0.003172214,0.001968201,0.002494856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001129962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001799095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002894575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003900111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9680862,0.01055881,0.002405695,0.003200852,0.01465042,0.001098034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8958637,0.07528257,0.002862126,0.009604579,0.01540916,0.0009778589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004061442,0.0008556445,0.006725061,0.005169124,0.001280998,0.0003012629,0.00166623,0.007985872,0.02662697,0.006960003,0.009240991,0.9291266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002641487,0.01047329,0.09504941,0.004043081,0.005374645,0.006689987,0.007242608,0.4988413,0.2073684,0.03515309,0.1258211,0.001301569],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1984122,0.05164195,0.6766661,0.002108339,0.0008782764,0.001612784,0.003243099,0.03847303,0.02696426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2852705,0.02212704,0.6717298,0.0005015834,0.0003849149,0.0007252343,0.008615077,0.005161783,0.005484048],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01555972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08228862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2129633692618179,"score_gpt":0.393424555326941,"score_spread":0.1804611860651231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}