{"id":"W2124851112","doi":"10.1016/s0143-7496(99)00013-5","title":"Stiffness behaviour due to fracture in adhesively bonded composite-to-aluminum joints I. Theoretical model","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Boeing (Canada)","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Materials science; Adhesive; Stiffness; Deflection (physics); Composite material; Structural engineering; Lap joint; Composite number; Cracking; Joint stiffness; Joint (building); Adhesive bonding; Fracture (geology); Fracture mechanics; Tension (geology); Ultimate tensile strength; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002071187,0.0002520628,0.0004121927,0.0004203422,0.00003672654,0.0001131002,0.0005461486,0.0001303647,0.0007043456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007875864,0.0002228544,0.000128795,0.0001430918,0.00005010963,0.0002556381,0.00006862178,0.0004012204,0.0000797651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009870131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003509242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004439228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002756299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981623,0.00005492934,0.0006688435,0.0002171468,0.0006362405,0.0002605099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989812,0.0001494288,0.00007740196,0.0001374879,0.000233863,0.0004205999],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001734814,0.0006146654,0.003514057,0.0000364362,0.0001441624,0.001599048,0.00217139,0.03594425,0.9170269,0.004969837,0.003748037,0.02849645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004776181,0.0009113912,0.2579785,0.001793078,0.0001557705,0.001430178,0.0004430476,0.03148428,0.6835255,0.013864,0.00212745,0.001510593],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958076,0.0001078621,0.001051809,0.002119275,0.0002751225,0.0001606843,0.00002008953,0.00003994648,0.0004175543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993999,0.00006911717,0.004683373,0.0009491065,0.0001417346,0.000007122538,0.000004202981,0.00003635167,0.0001100079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2544644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.908774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01022897200065873,"score_gpt":0.2605128392392996,"score_spread":0.2502838672386408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}