{"id":"W2124851112","doi":"10.1016/s0143-7496(99)00013-5","title":"Stiffness behaviour due to fracture in adhesively bonded composite-to-aluminum joints I. Theoretical model","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Boeing (Canada)","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Materials science; Adhesive; Stiffness; Deflection (physics); Composite material; Structural engineering; Lap joint; Composite number; Cracking; Joint stiffness; Joint (building); Adhesive bonding; Fracture (geology); Fracture mechanics; Tension (geology); Ultimate tensile strength; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004123354,0.0005541589,0.0006096939,0.0006973336,0.0006739236,0.0008073294,0.001692812,0.002532052,0.004282023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001919553,0.0007126646,0.0007747126,0.0003423067,0.002046606,0.0009279339,0.0006924417,0.0008555105,0.0009380646],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007877942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000576894,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003887548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00210116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997692,0.00005480085,0.000006330622,0.00003333715,0.00009060751,0.00004585682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995689,0.0002338821,0.0000692243,0.00004082193,0.0000582723,0.00002892788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001882287,0.0001133071,0.0007991176,0.0001995254,0.00002467736,0.000899328,0.0003609584,0.8776445,0.03536492,0.07745934,0.0007939809,0.006152196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001473548,0.00005132287,0.0005858978,0.00001724212,0.00001098452,0.0001249158,0.00004736998,0.988898,0.001584965,0.008374973,0.0002681873,0.00002141756],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5341224,0.003552617,0.3602779,0.001386547,0.0002666385,0.0001545381,0.0002574665,0.0008593719,0.09912257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818539,0.000565342,0.003774054,0.00008854689,0.00003787127,0.00005316704,0.0000337341,0.00005579706,0.01353756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004282023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01432478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01022897200065873,"score_gpt":0.2605128392392996,"score_spread":0.2502838672386408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}