{"id":"W2124870346","doi":"10.1017/jfm.2013.149","title":"The wave instability pathway to turbulence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Fluid Mechanics","topic":"Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Instability; Subharmonic; Turbulence; Mixing (physics); Mechanics; Internal wave; Parametric statistics; Breaking wave; Transient (computer programming); Rogue wave; Monochromatic color; Wave turbulence; Scale (ratio); Classical mechanics; Wave propagation; Nonlinear system; Optics; Computer science; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000254951,0.000261133,0.0003267001,0.0007427885,0.0007488496,0.00297588,0.0005230503,0.0006830075,0.008447739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008472109,0.0001573732,0.0002949532,0.0002898719,0.001774814,0.002544335,0.002222472,0.00179839,0.001074487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008083581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006751585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008310442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004715698,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997696,0.00004480482,0.000009132163,0.0000403874,0.00009058465,0.0000453886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995957,0.0001020654,0.00005880221,0.00005092392,0.00008999076,0.0001026017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008448788,0.0000537158,0.001701364,0.0001516168,0.00002630696,0.0003133399,0.0003374678,0.005822249,0.01550157,0.9363613,0.00640017,0.03324639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002729457,0.00009530238,0.001973133,0.00008931784,0.000007115034,0.0001881756,0.0002571438,0.03520679,0.002812044,0.9359717,0.02332972,0.00004219551],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4411806,0.03121272,0.1892933,0.04281441,0.002437599,0.0001290952,0.0009016006,0.001382336,0.2906483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979674,0.004784422,0.00491511,0.0005227409,0.0004730515,0.00004896564,0.00009055379,0.0000552802,0.009435693],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008447739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02826047,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01002375159426939,"score_gpt":0.1806418662522772,"score_spread":0.1706181146580078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}