{"id":"W2124881174","doi":"10.1139/f07-038","title":"Is growth a reliable indicator of habitat quality and essential fish habitat for a juvenile estuarine fish?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Otolith; Habitat; Juvenile; Abiotic component; Estuary; Juvenile fish; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Nursery habitat; Abundance (ecology); Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002108911,0.0004054058,0.0004767737,0.00130135,0.0003168583,0.000595006,0.0005997759,0.0006876496,0.0006842085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00662225,0.0002700754,0.0002504994,0.001472929,0.001294232,0.00095499,0.0004536514,0.0004280444,0.0003034611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004588877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003910127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02421592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05427321,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991406,0.0002598597,0.00009989765,0.0002221617,0.0001889797,0.00008840436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925016,0.001538747,0.003799308,0.0007039154,0.00114972,0.0003066311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003034363,0.00001069999,0.9926143,0.00001516601,0.0000323848,0.00002372438,0.00005080386,0.0001009598,0.0007104391,0.0000285636,0.0001152164,0.006267498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001159719,0.00003081769,0.9990298,0.000008012096,0.000007675879,0.00004642606,0.0001350263,0.0004315013,0.0001193839,0.00005539662,0.0001303805,0.000004390242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953309,0.0007513938,0.001804864,0.000328252,0.0000252976,0.000007833325,0.0006961498,0.00002123264,0.001034197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979458,0.0002108458,0.001202171,0.00007318624,0.00002597489,0.000007140391,0.0003119388,0.000005897756,0.0002171069],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02421592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04814994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02591618432820125,"score_gpt":0.2747898106201367,"score_spread":0.2488736262919354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}