{"id":"W2124895096","doi":"10.1046/j.1095-8649.2003.00032.x","title":"Microgeographic population structure of brook charr: a comparison of microsatellite and mark‐recapture data","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Fish Biology","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Salvelinus; Biology; Microsatellite; Genetic structure; Mark and recapture; Population; Genetic distance; Population genetics; Genetic data; Isolation by distance; Ecology; Zoology; Trout; Genetic variation; Fishery; Allele; Genetics; Demography; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005984853,0.00009053946,0.0001472364,0.0007954369,0.00027074,0.0003773047,0.0001491968,0.00009473676,0.0003404284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001147184,0.00009717376,0.0001148747,0.0006285722,0.0003899743,0.000158646,0.000279662,0.0001412049,0.00009620676],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008623806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005827475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09597924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2391393,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997143,0.00005445126,0.00001954813,0.00009585839,0.0000705172,0.00004522808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990755,0.0001770821,0.0003313401,0.00007317482,0.0002415206,0.0001012884],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007444601,0.0000123654,0.9877878,0.00001089824,0.00005173557,0.00004009242,0.000686513,0.0003454334,0.004438335,0.00005835549,0.00006889585,0.006425218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002610842,0.00002167634,0.9991944,0.000001999281,0.00000791349,0.00005811354,0.0001789328,0.0002821324,0.0001267292,0.00001203351,0.000110625,0.000002809918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997378,0.00001797568,0.00009136564,0.000005315532,2.394713e-7,9.295306e-7,0.0000701923,0.000001919466,0.00007421516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991193,0.00002622852,0.0002585951,0.000006233237,0.000001010986,0.00000286326,0.00046728,0.000001571147,0.0001169128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09597924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1908411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01505228449000357,"score_gpt":0.2600545339966776,"score_spread":0.245002249506674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}