{"id":"W2124955994","doi":"10.1002/eco.1687","title":"A quantitative assessment on the response of flow regimes to cumulative forest disturbances in large snow‐dominated watersheds in the interior of British Columbia, Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecohydrology","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Watershed; Magnitude (astronomy); Hydrology (agriculture); Snow; Willow; Context (archaeology); Forest management; Ecosystem; Climate change; Streamflow; Cumulative effects; Ecology; Geography; Drainage basin; Agroforestry; Geology; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001886756,0.00009188014,0.0002753137,0.00004658787,0.00005649026,0.000009254285,0.0003641093,0.00004726985,0.0001086465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003076477,0.00007628721,0.0000274113,0.0003047845,0.0003385971,0.00006199042,0.0002400121,0.0001406222,0.000008453669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001688955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003682033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5918189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9849815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980834,0.0008754951,0.0003113806,0.0002423799,0.0001968132,0.0002905209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998929,0.0007059453,0.0001124467,0.0002102208,0.00001261345,0.00002976168],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00144152,0.0002264995,0.9399784,0.000009156451,0.00006707384,0.0001437096,0.01348767,0.02354516,0.0001705226,0.0001903682,0.02059873,0.000141194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001045691,0.001226101,0.9801147,0.00004553993,0.00001382274,0.00000360621,0.002532236,0.01037075,0.00007990103,0.001470518,0.002964672,0.0001324747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916788,0.00001827474,0.00002997213,0.005969319,0.0001065727,0.0004608505,0.00003743549,0.00000351325,0.00169524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980378,0.000004711841,0.0000918438,0.001275093,0.00000380499,0.0001010814,0.000005544935,0.000005471545,0.0004746463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3931626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4108992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01534353136277236,"score_gpt":0.2562596169595014,"score_spread":0.2409160855967291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}