{"id":"W2125043282","doi":"10.1109/isit.1997.613323","title":"A constructive approach for reducing the state complexity of self-dual lattices","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Nonlinear Optical Materials Research","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Lambda; Lattice (music); Trellis (graph); Mathematics; Basis (linear algebra); Representation (politics); Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics; Computational complexity theory; Constructive; Lattice reduction; State (computer science); Algorithm; Computer science; Decoding methods; Geometry; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007278719,0.00009676522,0.0002098658,0.00003084516,0.0001304297,0.00009538054,0.0002711133,0.00003236544,0.001361589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000131077,0.00005785703,0.00004400374,0.0001096972,0.0007295763,0.0001236488,0.0001378139,0.00006289034,0.00005378075],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002157436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002483876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001315229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004532326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998748,0.0001429558,0.0002741649,0.0002423116,0.0002794314,0.0003131423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990677,0.0003434154,0.00008945907,0.0002639031,0.0001752745,0.000060305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001181149,0.000361544,0.00005387401,0.0002785474,0.00003971797,0.000001231984,0.001806825,0.0001408346,0.9606768,0.03520894,0.0006595727,0.0006539439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006834895,0.0002222472,0.0002642602,0.00001394533,0.00002374335,0.00002017003,0.000678372,0.07016445,0.9223031,0.00515195,0.000290011,0.0001842255],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867525,0.00002854965,0.003249598,0.0003123477,0.000138811,0.0006405285,0.0001528583,0.00007717883,0.008647692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7620003,0.000005112964,0.2375737,0.00002876131,0.00008906549,0.00003722659,0.000002984783,0.0000109531,0.000251821],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2343241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995513,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1071981090610745,"score_gpt":0.3245948802371398,"score_spread":0.2173967711760653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}