{"id":"W2125214656","doi":"10.1139/a03-001","title":"Modeling the role of papermill sludge in the organic carbon cycle of paper products","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Reviews","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Paperboard; Environmental science; Waste management; Sewage sludge; Carbon cycle; Carbon fibers; Life-cycle assessment; Pulp and paper industry; Sewage treatment; Production (economics); Environmental engineering; Engineering; Ecology; Ecosystem; Biology; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004403243,0.0005672729,0.0003604555,0.0004658667,0.0004568691,0.0009545311,0.0005975919,0.001300457,0.001285798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008827455,0.0003770884,0.0006711505,0.0006106662,0.0003887216,0.001275369,0.0002759681,0.0004523352,0.0001960409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001600074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001661434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03023402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02492879,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999001,0.00003871186,0.000005295057,0.00001973495,0.00001960937,0.0000165001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996768,0.0002337527,0.00003178019,0.00000993777,0.00003103793,0.00001670812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003013379,0.00002626585,0.001856386,0.00003660812,0.000008479823,0.00004349765,0.00002252412,0.9926327,0.0009022912,0.001991888,0.00006492025,0.002384256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001050666,0.00003828028,0.0006251382,0.000008132267,0.00001174909,0.00002047697,0.00002197235,0.9948402,0.001034415,0.002765156,0.0006162498,0.000007649312],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.9265363,0.001362166,0.05891821,0.0004664736,0.00004315834,0.00008746172,0.0008217918,0.0001169223,0.01164744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875865,0.0008305147,0.006929928,0.00003013836,0.00001100467,0.00007694624,0.0002383764,0.00001973305,0.004276888],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03023402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06011605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00928255433458993,"score_gpt":0.2186495606466372,"score_spread":0.2093670063120472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}