{"id":"W2125214656","doi":"10.1139/a03-001","title":"Modeling the role of papermill sludge in the organic carbon cycle of paper products","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Reviews","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Paperboard; Environmental science; Waste management; Sewage sludge; Carbon cycle; Carbon fibers; Life-cycle assessment; Pulp and paper industry; Sewage treatment; Production (economics); Environmental engineering; Engineering; Ecology; Ecosystem; Biology; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00150402,0.0002202624,0.0003270436,0.00001615203,0.00007714118,0.000006711636,0.0004472656,0.0000595482,0.0009822363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001499462,0.0001240923,0.0001193749,0.0002379487,0.0003989554,0.000165443,0.0001449006,0.0002151622,0.00007011419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002350669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007652315,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002296917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006468264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977669,0.0005664785,0.0006056289,0.0003285414,0.00041411,0.0003183768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998925,0.00005255262,0.0001588307,0.0008146914,4.287789e-7,0.00004844299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003018632,0.001334092,0.3090996,0.00007216299,0.00001874405,0.000004772396,0.008348223,0.002754128,0.6512209,0.0001510209,0.00005305877,0.02691304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00195486,0.0007367664,0.4607235,0.0001711212,0.0002774344,0.00009202264,0.02557353,0.007934804,0.2000344,0.008311792,0.2925554,0.001634373],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9806117,0.007867075,0.000005149733,0.0001196698,0.00002696941,0.001006873,0.000002581355,0.000003723245,0.01035629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996291,0.003137109,0.0001342532,0.0002389531,0.0000106281,0.00005471511,0.000003637034,0.00001837496,0.0001113477],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4511865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00928255433458993,"score_gpt":0.2186495606466372,"score_spread":0.2093670063120472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}