{"id":"W2125222293","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.10.003","title":"An evaluation of the current radiative forcing benefit of the Montreal Protocol at the high-Alpine site Jungfraujoch","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Science of The Total Environment","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bundesamt für Umwelt","keywords":"Montreal Protocol; Radiative forcing; Environmental science; Greenhouse gas; Atmospheric sciences; Chlorofluorocarbon; Global warming; Forcing (mathematics); Atmosphere (unit); Greenhouse effect; Radiative transfer; Climatology; Ozone layer; Ozone; Climate change; Meteorology; Aerosol; Physics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004640033,0.0003893445,0.0002875153,0.0004887242,0.001817425,0.001182475,0.001676407,0.0008596953,0.005080657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00503511,0.0001470554,0.000316557,0.0007673519,0.0006723566,0.000642147,0.0006811699,0.000490797,0.0003871867],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00968473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01162311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9141181,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984528,0.0005443197,0.00004021725,0.0001452405,0.0005245596,0.0002929238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975019,0.0006335753,0.0001791057,0.0002933359,0.00109146,0.0003006279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01061951,0.003428813,0.3501018,0.0005788834,0.0005669875,0.0008336458,0.001957598,0.2768738,0.05157698,0.02252066,0.05415436,0.226787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001698277,0.002168684,0.8516006,0.00009333844,0.0003121809,0.00006322682,0.001582066,0.08165987,0.01434764,0.001298872,0.04496907,0.0002061739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9516055,0.0002686076,0.003511509,0.002532427,0.0001204524,0.0006158703,0.00711147,0.0004001198,0.03383406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849045,0.0001080042,0.005825957,0.0002554838,0.00003085149,0.0002950598,0.002017898,0.00008159166,0.006480543],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.84719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3074198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009370763462140864,"score_gpt":0.2485320012613817,"score_spread":0.2391612377992408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}