{"id":"W2125266536","doi":"10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01335.x","title":"A Retrospective Economic Analysis of the Ontario Red Fox Oral Rabies Vaccination Programme","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zoonoses and Public Health","topic":"Rabies epidemiology and control","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Rabies; Vulpes; Indemnity; Vaccination; Cost–benefit analysis; Economic analysis; Veterinary medicine; Toxicology; Medicine; Environmental health; Biology; Virology; Business; Agricultural economics; Ecology; Economics; Predation; Actuarial science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001173309,0.0001182412,0.0005127575,0.0001465207,0.0003004132,0.00001799278,0.0001769955,0.0002137447,0.000896473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002570496,0.00008040193,0.0001562497,0.0001934506,0.0001847349,0.00010494,0.00005802324,0.0004332827,0.000008278456],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001262974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004447673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05607712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4017143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998595,0.000348689,0.0003863391,0.0002588811,0.000018997,0.0003921087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991141,0.000147165,0.0003286553,0.0003072956,0.00006408508,0.00003867912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004913677,0.00008099684,0.9296591,0.000008425385,0.00104285,1.011804e-7,0.001371525,0.000003697229,0.0003645093,0.02701998,0.001037485,0.03936216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000579423,0.0001406947,0.9161214,0.00000188406,0.0001036957,0.00000598292,0.000205422,0.0000550868,0.00003859988,0.0008172648,0.08185708,0.00007341702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832253,0.0004565548,0.00005140841,0.01429308,0.0006240109,0.0002977778,0.00003896402,0.00002579456,0.0009871424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980591,0.00005830757,0.00005238465,0.0006236761,0.00001713865,0.00002801839,0.00006341152,0.000005065584,0.001092885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3456371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9815751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02486752030020443,"score_gpt":0.2735429001165464,"score_spread":0.2486753798163419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}