{"id":"W2125266536","doi":"10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01335.x","title":"A Retrospective Economic Analysis of the Ontario Red Fox Oral Rabies Vaccination Programme","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zoonoses and Public Health","topic":"Rabies epidemiology and control","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Rabies; Vulpes; Indemnity; Vaccination; Cost–benefit analysis; Economic analysis; Veterinary medicine; Toxicology; Medicine; Environmental health; Biology; Virology; Business; Agricultural economics; Ecology; Economics; Predation; Actuarial science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001214614,0.0002819144,0.0003281469,0.001437887,0.0004068383,0.000699891,0.0004318651,0.0002944337,0.001471649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006087283,0.000347173,0.0005942191,0.002219901,0.0002967086,0.0002860157,0.0004198132,0.0002758932,0.0001197122],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02004749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007079431,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7605313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7551995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988276,0.0002619044,0.00008070597,0.00008663475,0.0004689603,0.0002740518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973103,0.0006167539,0.0008882004,0.0001300142,0.0008662487,0.0001885144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002046839,0.000123658,0.9542456,0.0003146757,0.0005149101,0.0005499542,0.0004366507,0.01187774,0.0004527119,0.0009565448,0.002428979,0.02605157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003052451,0.0001717966,0.992871,0.00004108549,0.0001165162,0.0001426548,0.0002084739,0.003026776,0.0001079158,0.00005692488,0.003212311,0.00001411214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882448,0.0008138258,0.000279865,0.0001561534,0.000004777209,0.0001830929,0.007031938,0.000005543367,0.003279998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948278,0.0005227549,0.0002119584,0.00005319081,0.0000061155,0.00006823364,0.003275443,0.000003463581,0.001030877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2394687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4817579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02486752030020443,"score_gpt":0.2735429001165464,"score_spread":0.2486753798163419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}