{"id":"W2125279207","doi":"10.1109/icsm.2015.7332457","title":"Investigating code review quality: Do people and participation matter?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université de Montréal; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Code review; Computer science; Software quality; Quality (philosophy); Code (set theory); Software bug; Software engineering; Process (computing); Source code; KPI-driven code analysis; Empirical research; Static program analysis; Software inspection; Set (abstract data type); Software development; Software; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001010737,0.00005801405,0.0001102281,0.00003168452,0.00002638516,0.0001102873,0.0002295969,0.00001758456,0.00001757091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001634279,0.00005035704,0.0000103849,0.0002802618,0.00001643097,0.0002730823,0.0002040676,0.00006680372,0.0001461786],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002314963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004388102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007265112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000152679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991361,0.00007895345,0.0001595458,0.0001869495,0.0002766466,0.0001617437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999078,0.0003062707,0.00002861882,0.000319567,0.00008326304,0.000184287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[5.529212e-7,0.00002582934,0.8959464,0.001052594,0.00001129192,0.000002459024,0.002388071,0.0001222269,0.0001400183,0.0175961,0.04112047,0.04159399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000648551,0.0001203721,0.9156625,0.001244822,0.00001285052,0.00003391453,0.00008150267,0.0647135,0.0007657786,0.007583672,0.008500682,0.0006318243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3732587,0.005141086,0.6082323,0.01104926,0.0001644436,0.000316423,0.000001036181,0.0005109574,0.001325875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9358208,0.0001265539,0.06191536,0.00177912,0.00002904649,0.00004403108,0.00000159534,0.000008735986,0.0002747651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5625621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20535,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1181563120664879,"score_gpt":0.3832507134207964,"score_spread":0.2650944013543085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}