{"id":"W2125289247","doi":"10.1016/s0732-8893(03)00138-x","title":"Evaluation of sputum decontamination methods for Mycobacterium tuberculosis using viable colony counts and flow cytometry","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease","topic":"Mycobacterium research and diagnosis","field":"Medicine","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health; Health Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Human decontamination; Sputum; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Microbiology; Flow cytometry; Tuberculosis; Contamination; Viability assay; Colony-forming unit; Viable count; Bacteria; Chromatography; Biology; Chemistry; Medicine; Immunology; Pathology; Cell; Biochemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001126402,0.0001058524,0.0002210938,0.0001507949,0.0000802218,0.00001260336,0.00001787512,0.0001016037,0.0003241605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008135061,0.00009790745,0.00004754484,0.0001177118,0.0001032579,0.00006041034,0.00001649042,0.00006266562,0.000004322681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007493754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002086015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001481837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003922816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990612,0.0003169535,0.0001709188,0.0002108891,0.00005899958,0.0001809934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981045,0.00116218,0.00006291376,0.000111072,0.0004015787,0.0001577276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002991775,0.0007423444,0.7784753,0.00107103,0.0004556286,0.000008043944,0.0001139947,0.00002278529,0.1742695,0.0007411581,0.002224284,0.04157669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01378418,0.002488708,0.8536079,0.0006683249,0.007436681,0.0004518703,0.0001114857,0.02063882,0.07010555,0.005214207,0.02460947,0.0008828099],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900317,0.003521893,0.004662002,0.00004136462,0.0002460377,0.0007994316,0.0001341993,0.00001468923,0.0005487292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964812,0.0007217722,0.00231075,0.0001713838,0.00003967327,0.000111191,0.0001333143,0.00001151336,0.00001915334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.104164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9739015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02535907189429098,"score_gpt":0.3576267673481326,"score_spread":0.3322676954538417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}