{"id":"W2125349087","doi":"10.2527/jas.2010-3361","title":"Accuracy of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in crossbred beef cattle1","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Animal Science","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture Food and Rural Development; University of Alberta","funders":"Beef Cattle Research Council; University of Alberta; Alberta Beef Producers","keywords":"Sire; Best linear unbiased prediction; Residual feed intake; Crossbreed; Statistics; Beef cattle; Population; Biology; Linear regression; Residual; Regression; Random effects model; Genomic selection; Animal science; Mathematics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Genetics; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Body weight; Feed conversion ratio; Computer science; Genotype; Medicine; Machine learning; Meta-analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006944679,0.00007598418,0.000137014,0.00008084902,0.00006300078,0.00001590874,0.0004704002,0.00005400892,0.00001432532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003601043,0.00006430504,0.00006081647,0.0001037216,0.000362925,0.00001296119,0.00008545307,0.00007373805,6.473186e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001724953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003799532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002602314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001323436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991192,0.00001629173,0.0003451165,0.0001530534,0.0001643116,0.0002020625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992528,0.00002532019,0.0003019254,0.0001069602,0.0002371726,0.00007582288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004444591,0.00005320363,0.005234968,0.000009254612,0.000007964218,5.141592e-7,0.0007288743,0.00003366349,0.9914396,0.00067909,0.0001649754,0.001203417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004480175,0.002217566,0.601199,0.00001954304,0.000009985733,0.00002893353,0.0003859865,0.000007754305,0.3937552,0.001728095,0.0001242968,0.00007560541],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979699,0.0003355474,0.0008100389,0.00003572427,0.0001869214,0.00008669145,0.000006211371,0.000001016243,0.0005679101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9533015,0.00001968065,0.04641086,0.00003043247,0.0002020954,0.000001163403,4.662e-7,0.000005573602,0.0000282541],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5976844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2622284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03935384310301533,"score_gpt":0.2947932670499964,"score_spread":0.2554394239469811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}