{"id":"W2125425712","doi":"10.1139/cjc-2015-0095","title":"A comparison of hydrocarbon and alkali metal response in the flame ionization detector used in subcritical water chromatography","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Chemistry","topic":"Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Flame ionization detector; Alkali metal; Formic acid; Hydrocarbon; Gas chromatography; Analyte; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Potassium; Chromatography; Thermal conductivity detector; Methanol; Hydrogen; Inorganic chemistry; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005725427,0.0001670308,0.0004001004,0.0001349728,0.00003360035,0.00004112439,0.0003117963,0.0002112119,0.000143948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003289882,0.0001244706,0.0001292037,0.0003179659,0.0003219346,0.00009159213,0.00001466618,0.0004548321,6.451708e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000891516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003918001,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003150736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005818087,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985247,0.00006282562,0.0006314008,0.000153705,0.0002985126,0.0003288595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989324,0.0001393841,0.0001325375,0.0002044795,0.0001103133,0.0004809114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003325022,0.000096162,0.199135,0.0002305071,0.00005206861,0.0003318203,0.002429301,0.00004056274,0.7972043,0.00001061658,0.0001097556,0.00002740557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001287391,0.00005254322,0.002062889,0.0001919242,0.00005475841,0.0003118777,0.005557916,0.0003837545,0.9891095,0.0004268498,0.0003657179,0.0001948934],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977779,0.0006285922,0.00001343357,0.0003783733,0.00001803406,0.00002521001,0.0000094897,0.000003827206,0.001145083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998298,0.000003405871,0.00003347504,0.00003001813,0.00006402031,0.000002535303,0.000009873853,0.00001338941,0.00001345118],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1970721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5075765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02014531691434345,"score_gpt":0.2553847345824014,"score_spread":0.2352394176680579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}