{"id":"W2125467036","doi":"10.1007/s00199-009-0449-x","title":"Enumeration of Nash equilibria for two-player games","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Group for Research in Decision Analysis","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Enumeration; Lexicographical order; Polytope; Polyhedron; Nash equilibrium; Vertex (graph theory); Computer science; Combinatorics; Best response; Implementation; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Algorithm; Mathematical optimization; Graph; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001954791,0.001249517,0.001864229,0.002373535,0.001709473,0.004940486,0.002261142,0.002046268,0.009813806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01302152,0.0008941866,0.001164287,0.00286796,0.002049324,0.005411754,0.002831956,0.002473425,0.001245533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001471446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001777935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001598211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002437472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977604,0.001149555,0.0001392687,0.0002663474,0.0003776783,0.0003067122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924664,0.005824102,0.0004254695,0.0004053939,0.0005579868,0.0003206538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002653182,0.0002621292,0.001326873,0.0002693746,0.00006599143,0.0001131522,0.0004838512,0.06039361,0.001256587,0.8877528,0.00418323,0.04362706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004132677,0.00002651009,0.0001523836,0.00004114662,0.00001525304,0.00004977132,0.00009939489,0.1065693,0.0004374274,0.8910314,0.001522447,0.00001354691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1564352,0.0006689099,0.7724262,0.00108904,0.00008358707,0.000292763,0.0007206058,0.0003173465,0.06796629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6887966,0.0008536462,0.2813643,0.0002954062,0.00008163793,0.0008124683,0.0016706,0.0001648345,0.02596053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009813806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03283048,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06540925519319622,"score_gpt":0.3943663148526824,"score_spread":0.3289570596594862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}