{"id":"W2125486854","doi":"10.1017/s0376892905002171","title":"An evaluation of mapped species distribution models used for conservation planning","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Russian Science Foundation","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Environmental niche modelling; Mahalanobis distance; Species distribution; Ecology; Set (abstract data type); Identification (biology); Inference; Computer science; Habitat; Geography; Ecological niche; Biology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001225819,0.0001763833,0.0001744426,0.00003944477,0.0002399663,0.00002101479,0.0001592251,0.0001513579,0.0008753008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006125041,0.000198683,0.00006391761,0.0001296532,0.0002121827,0.001371835,0.00003966565,0.00008390737,0.00005238596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005394776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003007415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004806679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007490455,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981888,0.0001947687,0.0004676075,0.0003654889,0.0005567882,0.000226528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991798,0.0001274367,0.000328724,0.0002763224,0.00002379062,0.00006387957],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001455681,0.0003974018,0.8977135,0.000008914452,0.00002278777,2.140794e-7,0.0007670968,0.04539603,0.04772566,0.0010279,0.003254684,0.003540282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009097447,0.000123303,0.6062151,0.000008181925,0.00005898362,0.000001746792,0.0002171155,0.3830208,0.005353623,0.001730713,0.002213371,0.0001473483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9694046,0.00002855239,0.02743782,0.001585762,0.00008830981,0.0009459915,0.0001147246,0.00004591386,0.0003482642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941544,0.000005729599,0.002406905,0.0007938941,0.0000756362,0.0001991333,0.002174848,0.00001767705,0.000171789],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3376247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.958393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05080223494906274,"score_gpt":0.2711364588169657,"score_spread":0.2203342238679029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}