{"id":"W2125486854","doi":"10.1017/s0376892905002171","title":"An evaluation of mapped species distribution models used for conservation planning","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Russian Science Foundation","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Environmental niche modelling; Mahalanobis distance; Species distribution; Ecology; Set (abstract data type); Identification (biology); Inference; Computer science; Habitat; Geography; Ecological niche; Biology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02227429,0.001228477,0.0007861722,0.003405157,0.0005567043,0.002243917,0.001715339,0.0009387888,0.002484034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07963285,0.0006368534,0.001008661,0.003023915,0.0006312666,0.002011786,0.001322183,0.0008149034,0.0003430872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002242766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001539642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01883051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01191443,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892148,0.007593355,0.0005015159,0.0006071434,0.001912329,0.0001708072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9371483,0.05155712,0.001541036,0.003695665,0.005671894,0.0003860186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000610801,0.0001903837,0.03468467,0.0002326128,0.0003718338,0.0001561949,0.0003169468,0.8774218,0.0004121763,0.004084069,0.001249528,0.08026893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007495532,0.0004385014,0.01088743,0.0001115635,0.00008215949,0.0000876029,0.0003803749,0.9828227,0.0007616638,0.002836669,0.00147802,0.00003835879],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8356109,0.00140412,0.1448904,0.0009044594,0.0001764193,0.0006074205,0.002796157,0.001587856,0.01202227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9341052,0.0005387155,0.06242114,0.00005543548,0.00002127859,0.0002735874,0.001587115,0.0001390748,0.0008583907],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02227429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1177991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05080223494906274,"score_gpt":0.2711364588169657,"score_spread":0.2203342238679029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}