{"id":"W2125491108","doi":"10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.02.002","title":"Food safety practices in a Portuguese canteen","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Food Control","topic":"Food Safety and Hygiene","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Saskatchewan Health Authority","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Checklist; Critical control point; Quality (philosophy); Food safety; Business; Hazard analysis and critical control points; Portuguese; Food hygiene; Control (management); Legislation; Hygiene; Environmental health; Operations management; Medicine; Food science; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Biology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000339134,0.0001315783,0.0002215785,0.0000148709,0.00009115924,0.00003035995,0.000244767,0.00007850039,0.0002659529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001613865,0.00005153305,0.00008280198,0.0002753134,0.00002106671,0.000203302,0.00001692214,0.0001606209,0.00003430144],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002394116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000150983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002214087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008580404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988499,0.0001058927,0.0002637386,0.0002658791,0.0001773751,0.0003372417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999423,0.0001797608,0.0001980465,0.00006694012,0.00003893903,0.00009331712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002564279,0.0007640551,0.005318117,0.000007621809,0.00009596196,0.00006296562,0.0002658738,0.00004343414,0.05793633,0.009038233,0.0006433266,0.9232598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001816063,0.01266077,0.9203607,0.00002946647,0.00002486275,0.00001647054,0.0003226967,0.0001656578,0.0004413331,0.002290108,0.06152741,0.0003444629],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9595674,0.001474531,0.000007685288,0.02952208,0.0001065332,0.0003955695,0.0001273204,0.00009468061,0.008704174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978151,0.00006401794,0.00002571717,0.001757767,0.0002207526,0.00001166208,0.00002262487,5.856348e-7,0.00008178985],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9229153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4788067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02476331120857137,"score_gpt":0.2347879335996434,"score_spread":0.2100246223910721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}