{"id":"W2125491108","doi":"10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.02.002","title":"Food safety practices in a Portuguese canteen","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Food Control","topic":"Food Safety and Hygiene","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Saskatchewan Health Authority","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Checklist; Critical control point; Quality (philosophy); Food safety; Business; Hazard analysis and critical control points; Portuguese; Food hygiene; Control (management); Legislation; Hygiene; Environmental health; Operations management; Medicine; Food science; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Biology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006841426,0.0006139913,0.0002355318,0.0009004389,0.005777444,0.001278684,0.0007226918,0.001124463,0.003116162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00135267,0.0002734311,0.0003307573,0.0007293031,0.002896114,0.0004151062,0.001415101,0.0008568146,0.0002621866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004200452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003080198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1144142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2333838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992622,0.0002026392,0.00003026393,0.0001068207,0.00009025737,0.0003077967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987967,0.0002483768,0.0002607417,0.0000512386,0.0001954266,0.0004475203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001043005,0.002236169,0.4834203,0.0004492492,0.00006745113,0.02399717,0.4079227,0.0007539727,0.02955409,0.001772349,0.001664327,0.04711915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001457732,0.001424439,0.5868859,0.0001708622,0.00004078497,0.002165501,0.3967499,0.0003594402,0.001155564,0.0002147069,0.01073645,0.00008191953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982598,0.00006531537,0.00003090592,0.000139923,0.000007825151,0.00001004877,0.00001813742,0.000001667418,0.001466293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967926,0.0001298063,0.0001115375,0.00005690547,0.000006723387,0.00000884793,0.00002072008,0.000001961991,0.002870843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1144142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2274965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02476331120857137,"score_gpt":0.2347879335996434,"score_spread":0.2100246223910721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}