{"id":"W2125619365","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101343","title":"Questionable content of an industry-supported medical school lecture series: a case study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Curriculum; Medical education; Conflict of interest; Public relations; Pharmaceutical industry; Process (computing); Political science; Business; Medicine; Psychology; Pedagogy; Law; Computer science; Pharmacology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01664578,0.0002762164,0.0007158943,0.0001723277,0.0003141235,0.00003283258,0.000802829,0.007963257,0.05261021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0279227,0.0002075466,0.0001538934,0.0003589455,0.0008102741,0.0004786809,0.0001597496,0.03967751,0.00004492951],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001264881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008760381,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001105411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003606936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900531,0.00380348,0.001715143,0.0002570604,0.003593635,0.0005775848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889267,0.002119267,0.0007022392,0.0002479385,0.002335879,0.005667971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006700887,0.04663235,0.2165018,0.004002198,0.007088743,0.3338161,0.04638157,0.001228761,0.009779205,0.00970219,0.1024351,0.2157311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06372453,0.03114218,0.02704871,0.004158168,0.003954865,0.4011378,0.1724873,0.03644056,0.0229806,0.01185259,0.2217992,0.00327352],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9109081,0.0005567237,0.0001165473,0.08598053,0.001563506,0.0005326313,0.00001733923,0.00003179713,0.0002927985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756276,0.0005378273,0.0001209319,0.02206632,0.001344385,0.00002358395,0.000005057032,0.00002065749,0.0002536653],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2124576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5923706838771461,"score_gpt":0.6128340212972897,"score_spread":0.02046333742014361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}