{"id":"W2125686244","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.07.017","title":"Information, learning, and the stability of fiat money","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Monetary Economics","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiat money; Economics; Perfect information; Stability (learning theory); Monetary economics; Imperfect; Value (mathematics); Endogenous money; Monetary policy; Government (linguistics); Money measurement concept; Keynesian economics; Velocity of money; Microeconomics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001452835,0.0001062313,0.0005224891,0.000119474,0.00006825498,0.00005206731,0.0001819763,0.00006437907,0.0001319432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007971332,0.00009166686,0.0001703729,0.00003727477,0.0001930604,0.0007063549,0.00005099622,0.0001902055,0.00001653525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005389038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002597965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003605725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002716821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982852,0.00002197088,0.001461572,0.00008206216,0.00001482823,0.0001343417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997865,0.0001440544,0.001732106,0.0001621733,0.00005088948,0.00004583673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003922361,0.00005461164,0.2073811,0.00004252647,0.0001629451,4.567214e-7,0.001302589,0.02177431,0.000003741398,0.7666414,0.0008909437,0.001353077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006258675,0.0002761256,0.07116093,0.00001906932,0.00005079301,0.00005654317,0.001228915,0.03001839,0.0002201748,0.7536637,0.1366441,0.0004026036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848174,0.002848327,0.001132295,0.000869677,0.0002777638,0.00009992116,0.00005287259,0.000003965227,0.009897819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972301,0.001893987,0.0005382998,0.00009337961,0.0001187052,0.00000137513,0.000005644325,0.000007889161,0.0001106092],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1362202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3738066,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009136108054117157,"score_gpt":0.1643936782424106,"score_spread":0.1552575701882935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}