{"id":"W2125713677","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02716.x","title":"Review of theoretical developments in stream ecology and their influence on stream classification and conservation planning","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Freshwater Biology","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"River ecosystem; STREAMS; Ecology; Scope (computer science); Stream restoration; Aquatic ecosystem; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Habitat; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002082589,0.00007966346,0.0001399573,0.00002999553,0.00002637835,0.000001044909,0.00007082448,0.00009867697,0.0003432913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002887003,0.00005508251,0.000006416057,0.00005040313,0.000566244,0.00005264655,0.0000320582,0.00007087704,0.000009701752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001000911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006825556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006032719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002257617,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993941,0.00007270984,0.0001932655,0.0001948799,0.00002171725,0.0001232995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997823,0.00006078708,0.00005460327,0.00007014566,0.000005807612,0.00002635704],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003791774,0.00004197004,0.9924516,0.00008349387,0.000005406739,0.00000134861,0.0005714193,0.000001677558,0.002740931,0.002671511,0.0000280932,0.001364644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001965814,0.0001863937,0.9877446,0.0002019676,0.000005067692,0.000004355111,0.00002619904,0.0000648179,0.005078481,0.004936683,0.001482303,0.00007251603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980875,0.0004093938,0.00001910804,0.0002337356,0.00001677108,0.0001177982,0.00000900996,0.000007270391,0.001099381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970903,0.001227204,0.0003230257,0.001300771,0.000001999295,0.00001778156,0.00003232301,0.000002675035,0.00000387885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004706952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3758799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02525508912525525,"score_gpt":0.2484442362040387,"score_spread":0.2231891470787834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}