{"id":"W2125739686","doi":"10.3758/bf03195792","title":"Does attention follow the motion in the “shooting line” illusion?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perception & Psychophysics","topic":"Visual perception and processing mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cued speech; Illusion; Luminance; Observer (physics); Fixation (population genetics); Optical illusion; Psychology; Motion (physics); Line (geometry); Computer vision; Cognitive psychology; Communication; Computer science; Mathematics; Physics; Geometry; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004346219,0.0001809786,0.0001176438,0.00007325628,0.000650826,0.0002175211,0.0004025717,0.00008246737,0.0008485434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009792428,0.00008619294,0.0001310141,0.0006664539,0.00009959636,0.0003743031,0.00003438229,0.0003668903,0.001066094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004458035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004514287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001379052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001426769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981051,0.0003855835,0.0002878697,0.0004254737,0.0005240272,0.0002719203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993064,0.000105786,0.0001261438,0.000379455,0.0000435234,0.00003869678],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002094714,0.0004014797,0.000197562,0.00001984625,0.000001654888,0.00000215392,0.01147253,0.0001513123,0.8014784,0.001144739,0.0008404195,0.1842689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008393968,0.001387222,0.2502171,0.0007355742,0.0002173497,0.0001560651,0.04594443,0.4941005,0.01010574,0.1482041,0.03709832,0.0034397],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9742561,0.000006996514,0.01186313,0.008867108,0.001242059,0.0004032909,0.000005009723,0.0001347132,0.003221598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925079,0.0001518462,0.0001429509,0.005175469,0.000590776,0.0000470691,0.000006184879,0.00002198938,0.001355819],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7913727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07730809111985731,"score_gpt":0.3226772353325044,"score_spread":0.2453691442126471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}