{"id":"W2125761211","doi":"10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34401-2","title":"A Retrospective Review of Patients Seen in a Multidisciplinary Pelvic Floor Clinic","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"Pelvic floor disorders treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Alexandra Hospital; Women and Children’s Health Research Institute; University of Alberta","funders":"Pfizer Canada","keywords":"Medicine; Multidisciplinary approach; Urinary incontinence; Pelvic floor; Conservative management; Multidisciplinary team; Retrospective cohort study; Gynecology; Pelvic floor dysfunction; Physical therapy; General surgery; Surgery; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004661761,0.0003207059,0.001124104,0.003240918,0.0006416558,0.0007869127,0.0005787941,0.0006069295,0.002574667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003184758,0.000409759,0.0006692369,0.004834352,0.0003359669,0.0006009091,0.0004395728,0.0003046537,0.0004338475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007213933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002474745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006401537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01521678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988722,0.0001563589,0.0004726807,0.0001925991,0.0002190188,0.00008708836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973264,0.0009652392,0.001084945,0.00007798996,0.0004108578,0.0001344648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009716575,0.0003141531,0.7991201,0.04261847,0.001529656,0.02922223,0.002575284,0.00008710276,0.002652538,0.000298677,0.008853014,0.111757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001563206,0.0005718817,0.8339702,0.01541272,0.003129817,0.1005501,0.006159252,0.00006154626,0.0006149943,0.00008884883,0.03921417,0.00007011383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.4674721,0.521957,0.0002313252,0.000364839,0.0001605482,0.0002798284,0.004760006,0.00001527236,0.004759001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7215061,0.2711255,0.0008629167,0.001196147,0.0001662945,0.0002533478,0.003705055,0.00001284062,0.001171783],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006401537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01272857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01921253197099569,"score_gpt":0.3045797166617917,"score_spread":0.285367184690796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}