{"id":"W2125854305","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9965.2006.00267.x","title":"CLASSICAL AND IMPULSE STOCHASTIC CONTROL FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF THE DIVIDEND AND RISK POLICIES OF AN INSURANCE FIRM","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Finance","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Stochastic control; Dividend; Bankruptcy; Impulse control; Dividend policy; Bellman equation; Optimization problem; Economics; Actuarial science; Payment; Mathematical optimization; Time horizon; Control (management); Optimal control; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002430386,0.001085144,0.0009199564,0.0009298105,0.0005647202,0.001903059,0.0009011702,0.001780148,0.003671257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006258032,0.0006255583,0.0009932327,0.0006800001,0.003273631,0.001383052,0.001409219,0.001788064,0.0001931957],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003845957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002765405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0133592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007368681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993411,0.0002914443,0.00001903507,0.00008735321,0.0001461832,0.0001148875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726,0.001981027,0.0003163602,0.00005327018,0.0002191664,0.0001701152],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040674,0.00004747216,0.0004286093,0.00007395875,0.00004795645,0.0000741355,0.00006515015,0.7828405,0.0006656424,0.2117408,0.0005743012,0.003400894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001421987,0.00002086972,0.0001609423,0.00001127336,0.00001165908,0.000007881075,0.00001887102,0.9610296,0.0001166339,0.03833343,0.0002637696,0.0000108198],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1105179,0.002101797,0.8660836,0.00297725,0.000220937,0.00006584656,0.0001322985,0.0001148234,0.01778557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9554454,0.001350921,0.02698671,0.0002149217,0.0001895898,0.0001695205,0.00008817618,0.00004433286,0.01551041],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0133592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02790451,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01017256837691073,"score_gpt":0.2653413377312072,"score_spread":0.2551687693542964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}