{"id":"W2125869498","doi":"10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.134","title":"Can performance-feedback accuracy be improved? Effects of rater priming and rating-scale format on rating accuracy.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Psychology","topic":"Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation","field":"Psychology","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Performance appraisal; Rating scale; Priming (agriculture); Cronbach's alpha; Differential (mechanical device); Scale (ratio); Cognitive psychology; Sample (material); Applied psychology; Social psychology; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06566194,0.0006848531,0.0007360342,0.0006531159,0.0005797515,0.001278823,0.0006833037,0.001179748,0.002728232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3512871,0.0005605157,0.0005498247,0.0006300422,0.00119676,0.002285202,0.00126608,0.001090867,0.0009620956],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005319207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006075765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006758911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007820938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9334657,0.04866904,0.003383394,0.003995302,0.009379541,0.00110713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4606408,0.4627048,0.04175292,0.02245416,0.01031964,0.002127674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03997188,0.005263116,0.503565,0.001342149,0.001123608,0.0003355449,0.01258763,0.002007694,0.08248219,0.001805969,0.002564748,0.3469504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006358726,0.01219456,0.9530658,0.0001452154,0.0004012078,0.0004531104,0.0006949512,0.003519609,0.0246084,0.001529093,0.002638037,0.0001140832],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762991,0.001057243,0.0116558,0.0007449168,0.0002459708,0.0007269442,0.0001433,0.0001920912,0.00893468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918579,0.0001731597,0.006095788,0.0003410053,0.0001036807,0.0004082848,0.00008013915,0.00005531956,0.0008846602],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06566194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3472577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02837006962025104,"score_gpt":0.3319743204737243,"score_spread":0.3036042508534733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}