{"id":"W2125920451","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.1031920","title":"Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 4. Assessing heterogeneity of primary studies in systematic reviews and whether to combine their results","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; Computer science; Data science; MEDLINE; Information retrieval; Meta-analysis; Evidence-based medicine; Alternative medicine; Management science; Medicine; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1199358,0.003550415,0.005841735,0.01157992,0.002937817,0.01180314,0.00769765,0.02210177,0.02809912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5056836,0.003377767,0.006035553,0.007498253,0.00755556,0.03233526,0.01032466,0.03137021,0.0284872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003736462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01480406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004421912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01050044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9125822,0.04758831,0.01901667,0.00197552,0.01760822,0.001229107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4423774,0.3730355,0.02087512,0.01197601,0.1369787,0.01475725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009798317,0.000106435,0.0004921364,0.003487707,0.0001246061,0.00028467,0.001001922,0.000214694,0.0002198522,0.003736802,0.8719943,0.1182389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008503643,0.0002089165,0.002401936,0.0244436,0.0004724698,0.00188437,0.00282782,0.001338929,0.0005308343,0.1262642,0.8383288,0.0004478199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002009838,0.01793494,0.02179764,0.9304398,0.02329444,0.0006155793,0.000469954,0.0007410324,0.004505581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005342246,0.04871451,0.3198368,0.533273,0.07265233,0.003919446,0.0009072261,0.001478571,0.01387569],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8800642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6342885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8831305008663716,"score_gpt":0.5910915994622226,"score_spread":0.292038901404149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}