{"id":"W2126030561","doi":"10.1177/0306312713509705","title":"Working data together: The accountability and reflexivity of digital astronomical practice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Studies of Science","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Accountability; Reflexivity; Set (abstract data type); Data science; Computer science; Data discovery; Citizen science; Data set; Ethnomethodology; Epistemology; Sociology; World Wide Web; Astronomy; Physics; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Metadata; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1185329,0.000927749,0.001055896,0.006413668,0.0158614,0.02374641,0.003987643,0.004860274,0.002702468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1416769,0.001128923,0.0008558293,0.003877746,0.1320226,0.03874252,0.02554767,0.008260622,0.0003598037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008414167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01013346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004548944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002577814,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7845426,0.1885439,0.004443886,0.008426124,0.01081575,0.003227743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7774178,0.1784133,0.009103785,0.02584113,0.006448782,0.002775142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002475823,0.00003052601,0.002197274,0.0001381109,0.00002650366,0.0002024003,0.7346678,0.0002880832,0.0004410109,0.2482967,0.0007212785,0.01296551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005092034,0.00008384064,0.001263268,0.0007721019,0.00004417013,0.0004838274,0.4192351,0.001467006,0.001306334,0.4663864,0.1088284,0.00007872179],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4347601,0.005389186,0.2789408,0.09945334,0.000679682,0.000370974,0.0001267969,0.0004720599,0.179807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985567,0.0004471509,0.01136909,0.0008448273,0.00006313597,0.0001277912,0.00002298369,0.0001032322,0.001454836],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6268691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07555759989843602,"score_gpt":0.3878445978588458,"score_spread":0.3122869979604098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}