{"id":"W2126099442","doi":"","title":"Loss Aversion and the Uniform Pricing Puzzle for Vertically Dierentiated Products","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Microeconomics; Loss aversion; Quality (philosophy); Novelty; Consumption (sociology); Database transaction; Risk aversion (psychology); Set (abstract data type); Shock (circulatory); Transaction cost; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001907535,0.0004276351,0.0009242213,0.0006594735,0.0006783365,0.003845058,0.001120714,0.00194348,0.008565815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01300568,0.0004136721,0.0007622859,0.001082385,0.002675436,0.004636696,0.001752581,0.003008496,0.0006024555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001161984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003352178,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002174217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001121602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994131,0.0001727865,0.00004093287,0.0001163,0.000134312,0.0001225795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943045,0.002540424,0.00196705,0.0006466752,0.0002849204,0.0002563996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004559075,0.0002005462,0.00987705,0.000164625,0.00008992646,0.001227773,0.0007248076,0.02634262,0.002305216,0.9201101,0.004208844,0.03429253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010619,0.00009018362,0.01268197,0.00004756964,0.0000474473,0.0005913397,0.0003428685,0.08883071,0.0004266757,0.8930663,0.003704001,0.00006477341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8461341,0.002361102,0.09135635,0.00626095,0.0001016033,0.00004581511,0.0002173774,0.0001356833,0.05338696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924524,0.0006365462,0.001892801,0.000202667,0.00007725452,0.00001086106,0.00006694799,0.00001467048,0.0046458],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008565815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02865553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01591445173120392,"score_gpt":0.2254110085162907,"score_spread":0.2094965567850868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}