{"id":"W2126225874","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-682x.2008.00219.x","title":"Scientific Certainty Argumentation Methods (SCAMs): Science and the Politics of Doubt*","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Inquiry","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Argumentation theory; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Scientific evidence; Law and economics; Law; Environmental ethics; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0825509,0.001234029,0.001446638,0.00790052,0.007626163,0.01803594,0.003173333,0.01045122,0.008688902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1683653,0.000808595,0.001198033,0.00676067,0.05570794,0.02707703,0.009588572,0.008251813,0.000949166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008252052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006959629,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002246695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002292374,"domain_scores_codex":[0.925221,0.06005171,0.002842106,0.002765316,0.008257898,0.0008620294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6807307,0.2863186,0.01217186,0.01000873,0.008809939,0.001960242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001613821,0.000007591491,0.0001721701,0.0001184695,0.00001579094,0.00004068386,0.002312495,0.0003212401,0.00003223989,0.9828755,0.001950436,0.01213728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009630026,0.000005072911,0.00006524604,0.0001608679,0.000004720174,0.0000312523,0.0006457681,0.001002128,0.00004632678,0.9854972,0.01252188,0.000009908908],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02092723,0.0455758,0.496704,0.2056452,0.002749178,0.000364098,0.000199848,0.0003490777,0.2274857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8009236,0.0122811,0.1641586,0.008731341,0.002480425,0.0009951824,0.0001240771,0.0002253579,0.01008023],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9923738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4365761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7387912801113541,"score_gpt":0.5704142898914499,"score_spread":0.1683769902199042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}