{"id":"W2126264239","doi":"10.1016/j.intman.2006.01.001","title":"A coevolutionary theory of the multinational firm","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Management","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Coevolution; Multinational corporation; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Industrial organization; Ambiguity; Subsidiary; Vagueness; Macro; Process (computing); Competitive advantage; Adaptation (eye); Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Marketing; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005103971,0.00008174507,0.00009497552,0.000308299,0.00007314534,0.00005426968,0.0004085057,0.00002794304,0.0003234742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005309048,0.00005687627,0.0001120499,0.0003522513,0.00006056821,0.0007453475,0.0001299509,0.0000962156,0.00001670132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005391389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001636622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002878552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004766123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987916,0.000009975383,0.0004970996,0.00007390329,0.000547445,0.00008000196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982454,0.0000291089,0.0008183149,0.00008880589,0.0008156992,0.000002735708],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008750727,0.000207099,0.02262182,0.00004785365,0.00008758721,0.000006282679,0.000004043557,0.002525324,0.0003040664,0.9561912,0.01577774,0.002139497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006858301,0.000005958421,0.8272288,0.0001035566,0.00004577907,0.00001140461,0.00009118395,0.001304657,0.0000759722,0.08577845,0.08459193,0.0000764694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.536835,0.0003365404,0.02084035,0.0179798,0.006892432,0.000442737,0.00001121218,0.00003838495,0.4166236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962122,0.00000749107,0.0006878047,0.0006311184,0.001048186,0.000003101306,0.00001088077,0.000007238722,0.001391932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8704127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3541816,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01029530765244705,"score_gpt":0.2119792580236312,"score_spread":0.2016839503711842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}