{"id":"W2126278297","doi":"10.1002/cjas.23","title":"Ownership concentration and corporate governance practices: substitution or expropriation effects?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Corporate governance; Stock exchange; Shareholder; Argument (complex analysis); Business; Accounting; Incentive; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Index (typography); Monetary economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Market economy; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004060111,0.0002393051,0.0002669354,0.0002209018,0.001435788,0.0009474224,0.0004873798,0.0001128736,0.00005228368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003111761,0.0002007176,0.00006099275,0.001778704,0.002767399,0.004908083,0.00001225288,0.0002303491,0.000007631801],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005824887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004486319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008719238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5323985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978201,0.00005218455,0.0006459382,0.0004283786,0.0003006855,0.0007527196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952026,0.0002604387,0.003561195,0.0001244545,0.0005721118,0.0002792088],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005556797,0.00009677315,0.5271168,0.00050328,0.00003677008,0.001978713,0.003687924,0.0005112985,0.004912422,0.4499298,0.0005324328,0.01013811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001314829,0.003454274,0.9315813,0.001005752,0.0001525273,0.001756144,0.006154408,0.004410409,0.004005193,0.03378844,0.01141261,0.0009640703],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895664,0.0002738255,0.004146627,0.001179866,0.0008005066,0.0002801064,0.00001372377,0.00001266416,0.003726278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960849,0.00004263484,0.002431964,0.0005540872,0.000719775,0.00000472665,0.000005470994,0.000009140203,0.0001473566],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5236793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1280567117370324,"score_gpt":0.3035699831434555,"score_spread":0.1755132714064231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}