{"id":"W2126282330","doi":"10.1002/smj.690","title":"Strategy making, novelty and analogical reasoning — commentary on Gavetti, Levinthal, and Rivkin (2005)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Novelty; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Abductive reasoning; Analogical reasoning; Management science; Cognitive science; Cognition; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Analogy; Psychology; Economics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006633671,0.0001997406,0.0002369366,0.0001143466,0.001572857,0.0002716407,0.0001842712,0.00006364968,0.0003407614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004774241,0.0001838797,0.00005302121,0.00008474168,0.0005302917,0.0002062471,0.0001339915,0.0003094688,0.00001012154],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001980589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003009393,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002819779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003426937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984612,0.0001496198,0.0003005232,0.0003080681,0.0002869898,0.0004935547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994519,0.00003813051,0.0001660143,0.00011009,0.00002517828,0.000208674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001548198,0.0004638327,0.05329624,0.00003445379,0.0003268656,0.002106542,0.004910194,0.00003374988,0.00008884796,0.9196159,0.01529732,0.003671206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01024631,0.003666348,0.115444,0.001034719,0.0005903108,0.001980225,0.372763,0.0007689969,0.0001740914,0.4300864,0.05917896,0.004066611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6431962,0.0006794343,0.000008703661,0.002418463,0.0001530653,0.0001878587,0.000004478512,0.00002937177,0.3533224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916026,0.005637317,0.000971226,0.001010981,0.0002403187,0.000008526105,0.000002601328,0.00001132783,0.0005150776],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4895296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.095916314487609,"score_gpt":0.3533839722274019,"score_spread":0.2574676577397929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}