{"id":"W2126295638","doi":"10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01058.x","title":"Direct and Indirect Effects of Internal Control Weaknesses on Accrual Quality: Evidence from a Unique Canadian Regulatory Setting*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accrual; Accounting; Credibility; Certification; Business; Audit; Quality (philosophy); Control (management); Path analysis (statistics); Empirical evidence; Quality audit; External auditor; Actuarial science; Internal audit; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007202747,0.0005640456,0.0007848809,0.002558019,0.004681498,0.003473807,0.001992961,0.001043985,0.005282938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04085521,0.0003911593,0.0007034162,0.005166842,0.005148056,0.0008301138,0.002588245,0.001698627,0.0003366934],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03185426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05725653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9777159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931426,0.001507811,0.000315891,0.0008847414,0.002789818,0.001359174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.945833,0.01972224,0.0139699,0.002877078,0.01258368,0.005014081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003154709,0.0002053962,0.9751244,0.00009758582,0.0001923151,0.0001395062,0.00351808,0.0003026866,0.0001497269,0.002006053,0.001955471,0.01599335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002879026,0.00005752072,0.9946504,0.00007729924,0.0001580463,0.00004124293,0.002403566,0.0002171277,0.0001020753,0.0003572709,0.00188034,0.00002626688],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842518,0.001770639,0.0002297956,0.001607482,0.00002706929,0.00005392431,0.001102241,0.000008859337,0.01094812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959077,0.0009811886,0.0002956836,0.0002016081,0.00001633694,0.00002285324,0.0004774941,0.00001455076,0.002082526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03185426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2311199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05066734685738787,"score_gpt":0.2929054889272094,"score_spread":0.2422381420698215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}