{"id":"W2126351729","doi":"10.1093/annhyg/meh075","title":"Principal Component Analysis is a Powerful Instrument in Occupational Hygiene Inquiries","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Annals of Occupational Hygiene","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Principal component analysis; Occupational hygiene; Principal (computer security); Hygiene; Field (mathematics); Psychology; Occupational science; Occupational therapy; Applied psychology; Computer science; Data science; Management science; Medicine; Occupational safety and health; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Mathematics; Computer security; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02912091,0.001183063,0.001832189,0.00773391,0.002727878,0.005317517,0.001261566,0.001637108,0.005523876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07109286,0.0008410608,0.0009601352,0.01113816,0.005828052,0.004477423,0.004319761,0.004180163,0.0032022],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001157369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003726096,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002756757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003336087,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9686073,0.01988514,0.001908753,0.001761714,0.007573925,0.0002631699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9411097,0.04513473,0.003640657,0.004598905,0.004911661,0.0006044965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000125138,0.0002000203,0.01736041,0.002339041,0.000281337,0.0003557699,0.009529975,0.002893986,0.003131182,0.1063997,0.04498828,0.8123952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007508918,0.0005985764,0.06715867,0.003008375,0.0001762342,0.001339892,0.008186272,0.008332393,0.004206678,0.4646986,0.441725,0.0004942727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.022686,0.01913687,0.8818376,0.01511322,0.001482568,0.002351191,0.002367467,0.002547086,0.05247796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09804769,0.0149798,0.8740563,0.00226906,0.001424717,0.002067112,0.0007714884,0.0004940342,0.00588978],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02912091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1540079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2417798440386073,"score_gpt":0.5051539305948679,"score_spread":0.2633740865562606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}