{"id":"W2126356947","doi":"10.1617/s11527-010-9598-4","title":"Toughness of fibre reinforced hydraulic lime mortar. Part-1: Quasi-static response","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Materials and Structures","topic":"Building materials and conservation","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mortar; Masonry; Materials science; Flexural strength; Composite material; Lime mortar; Compressive strength; Toughness; Geotechnical engineering; Solid mechanics; Shear (geology); Lime; Structural engineering; Geology; Engineering; Metallurgy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001361215,0.00016273,0.0001896416,0.0003008687,0.0001881333,0.0002212412,0.000377729,0.0002981378,0.00387507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004714435,0.0001342257,0.0002002604,0.0001371248,0.0006503385,0.0002584934,0.0002952044,0.0001697633,0.0002996566],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001631542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001138264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001141024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008339798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999217,0.000008557085,0.000002537573,0.00001801395,0.0000308198,0.00001838905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998043,0.000107935,0.00002143992,0.00002259461,0.00002750592,0.00001618903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009923307,0.0002366718,0.006621557,0.0002402011,0.00004578551,0.0006434223,0.0003899159,0.1073845,0.8566212,0.004181865,0.0008677549,0.0217748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004968806,0.0008950523,0.09702253,0.00003308833,0.00004174843,0.000626348,0.000549085,0.6421828,0.2540198,0.003028011,0.001472455,0.00007944295],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933417,0.0001285064,0.003617891,0.00004742564,0.00001529805,0.00001049519,0.0001118001,0.00003867971,0.002688183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986891,0.0000282239,0.0001165392,0.000006739238,0.000002857968,0.000003593746,0.00003800086,0.000006304262,0.001108578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00387507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01296341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01075252672726919,"score_gpt":0.2135003680984966,"score_spread":0.2027478413712274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}