{"id":"W2126376142","doi":"10.1071/wr06171","title":"Evaluation of predator numerical responses","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Yukon Department of Environment; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; University of Canberra","keywords":"Predator; Predation; Numerical response; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Population; Density dependence; Snowshoe hare; Population density; Trophic level; Functional response; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001099655,0.0003129361,0.0003369722,0.000589295,0.0003217894,0.0003917726,0.0003332045,0.0003404516,0.002295362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004824694,0.0001117596,0.0003338092,0.0003466838,0.0003180098,0.0003045755,0.000384093,0.0002321118,0.0003216177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001546752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005289657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02321441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02991602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994784,0.00009290998,0.00003856023,0.00009379098,0.0002288902,0.00006741121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979062,0.0008328316,0.0002645089,0.0001071373,0.0007071319,0.0001821821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00133247,0.000291734,0.8393841,0.000345555,0.0001426893,0.0002568813,0.0009916545,0.01384705,0.1007447,0.0004530856,0.0003523104,0.04185773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001647661,0.001192453,0.9662662,0.00001815879,0.00004569561,0.0001340046,0.0005915386,0.01924676,0.01136675,0.0002564261,0.0008397487,0.00002583265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961464,0.00009918321,0.001251568,0.00001797214,0.000004942946,0.00005389727,0.0004530635,0.00003160412,0.001941217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970613,0.00006963762,0.001338001,0.00001450006,0.000002587768,0.00006109041,0.0004155382,0.000006631829,0.001030646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02321441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04615855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1265211200123363,"score_gpt":0.4118154227088155,"score_spread":0.2852943026964793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}