{"id":"W2126376142","doi":"10.1071/wr06171","title":"Evaluation of predator numerical responses","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Yukon Department of Environment; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; University of Canberra","keywords":"Predator; Predation; Numerical response; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Population; Density dependence; Snowshoe hare; Population density; Trophic level; Functional response; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02232558,0.00006013363,0.000091148,0.0001040698,0.0001572924,0.000008473222,0.0002261005,0.00009865324,0.002781896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002466055,0.00005624799,0.0000302206,0.0006156369,0.0003536977,0.0001536843,0.0001535927,0.0002161169,0.0007572434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002568423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001319007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001940391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001031098,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962496,0.0009133159,0.0002380512,0.0002334312,0.002006215,0.0003594538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987282,0.0006820795,0.00005093595,0.0002715861,0.0001676908,0.00009956167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002036203,0.0001174417,0.9622426,0.000002790036,0.00001011873,0.000002632122,0.000157805,0.00009943733,0.0009171851,0.0002149217,0.01762686,0.01840459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002998534,0.0001449861,0.9901748,0.000006326419,0.00001161909,0.000003461827,0.000128551,0.002076038,0.0004834124,0.001161005,0.005450268,0.00005967724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819751,0.00003791946,0.0004154056,0.001042922,0.00006421046,0.0003051512,0.000002148645,0.00001708159,0.01614011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986426,0.000007322092,0.00047576,0.0002038273,0.00005365517,0.00002489036,0.000003367481,0.000007332795,0.000581302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02793221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981297,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1265211200123363,"score_gpt":0.4118154227088155,"score_spread":0.2852943026964793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}