{"id":"W2126377956","doi":"10.1080/07011784.2014.914789","title":"A collaborative approach to groundwater protection: The Rural Water Quality Program for Waterloo Region","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Wellhead; Environmental planning; Context (archaeology); Groundwater; Process (computing); Stewardship (theology); Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental science; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Geography; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002128752,0.0002037243,0.00011408,0.0005509612,0.008647848,0.00182512,0.001342056,0.0009278927,0.00619191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002420711,0.0001658012,0.0001809606,0.0009955093,0.00209652,0.0006727076,0.002225149,0.0006871052,0.0003450957],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03636527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1227849,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9116305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9829977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981251,0.0005427723,0.00003369811,0.0001685028,0.000551625,0.0005782737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978179,0.0003811418,0.0001049873,0.00008108062,0.0005386235,0.001076304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002366878,0.0018313,0.0584951,0.001154917,0.00005161626,0.00545685,0.08539323,0.004963177,0.01460584,0.04616845,0.1501644,0.6314785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002289303,0.000689322,0.1535454,0.000260576,0.00004812026,0.000577767,0.07213207,0.002115923,0.002396154,0.004361232,0.7635666,0.00007792161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4939609,0.002721402,0.01593027,0.09537838,0.0002769204,0.006202373,0.001136059,0.0004138154,0.3839797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8342534,0.002608116,0.03091552,0.002966118,0.00006956838,0.0009746717,0.0004763022,0.00005798732,0.1276782],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08836955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2638497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01911163948600432,"score_gpt":0.2442844147356871,"score_spread":0.2251727752496828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}