{"id":"W2126487939","doi":"10.1139/f05-135","title":"Reach-scale effects of riparian forest cover on urban stream ecosystems","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Riparian zone; Habitat; Biomass (ecology); Riparian forest; Ecology; Ecosystem; Land cover; Biota; Basal area; Hydrology (agriculture); Land use; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003488211,0.00008564568,0.0001739216,0.00006766469,0.0002070693,0.00003872381,0.0002192095,0.00004532202,0.0005204629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005768654,0.00006275575,0.00003525745,0.0001610859,0.0007383223,0.0003569734,0.000005491685,0.0000795295,0.00001331299],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003496796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001360688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003722792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07581938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991867,0.00002938603,0.000248455,0.0001209578,0.0002011566,0.000213339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993907,0.0001055392,0.0001530644,0.00006639547,0.000005558913,0.0002787576],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001322933,0.00003262768,0.9813858,0.00002770664,0.00001397907,0.00002603456,0.002538689,0.0005254875,0.0001859904,0.0001092759,0.005401597,0.009739535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002205377,0.005856083,0.6809832,0.0007061889,0.0001838516,0.0002234585,0.001861925,0.006584168,0.01258421,0.00297542,0.28506,0.0007761274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906562,0.0002841725,0.00004395271,0.00124573,0.0001658666,0.00006315309,0.000002247182,0.000001861457,0.007536836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991561,0.00002822832,0.0002598522,0.000276978,0.00005569397,0.000001114513,4.960075e-7,0.000003047765,0.0002185538],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3004026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9410445,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006900674207708941,"score_gpt":0.1864724797993168,"score_spread":0.1795718055916078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}