{"id":"W2126532874","doi":"10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250510.x","title":"A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecography","topic":"Soil Geostatistics and Mapping","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":705,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Polytechnique Montréal; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Statistics; Spatial analysis; Range (aeronautics); Autocorrelation; Spatial ecology; Ecology; Temporal scales; Variance (accounting); Variogram; Sample size determination; Sampling (signal processing); Population; Geography; Mathematics; Computer science; Cartography; Kriging; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1204464,0.001844453,0.003885251,0.00840168,0.002782385,0.0144343,0.004761952,0.004238968,0.002178954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2128221,0.001524177,0.002210801,0.009789675,0.02874028,0.02348739,0.008969257,0.01534127,0.0008738826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003707601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003155557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002041682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001664189,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8608578,0.09815677,0.01059533,0.008735987,0.02052801,0.001125947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7756263,0.1730715,0.006995982,0.02658878,0.01584465,0.001872804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007823437,0.00002045253,0.002709348,0.0005367069,0.0001832573,0.000106769,0.001646566,0.003813085,0.0006037743,0.931441,0.006315154,0.05254565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003248767,0.00006697447,0.001036536,0.0003156133,0.00005843534,0.000129726,0.0004676544,0.006256445,0.000242569,0.9584882,0.03284791,0.00005754732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003879431,0.01691438,0.9185506,0.04746205,0.002435265,0.0001441315,0.0001785048,0.0002782989,0.0101573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2000856,0.01764933,0.7471589,0.01761793,0.01146573,0.001514944,0.0001759782,0.0009120514,0.003419557],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1204464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6369888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007611264277835186,"score_gpt":0.2122003492496362,"score_spread":0.204589084971801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}