{"id":"W2126617044","doi":"10.1109/isqed.2009.4810325","title":"Timing yield estimation of digital circuits using a control variate technique","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Low-power high-performance VLSI design","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Quantile; Latin hypercube sampling; Estimator; Monte Carlo method; Computer science; Algorithm; Sampling (signal processing); Control variates; Process variation; Random variate; Process (computing); Statistics; Random variable; Mathematics; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Hybrid Monte Carlo; Detector","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009019218,0.0004017708,0.0004792159,0.0008940988,0.0002178489,0.000444726,0.0004366604,0.0003257503,0.0007893189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003782019,0.0002285808,0.0003663606,0.0006182418,0.0003852592,0.0005557344,0.0004736877,0.0003855645,0.0001520149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004713903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004933296,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001090238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001067832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994574,0.0001835745,0.00002586242,0.00007396622,0.000237551,0.00002163767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998915,0.0006316564,0.0001524103,0.0001241833,0.0001598621,0.00001694385],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003600939,0.00007746068,0.006723912,0.000154259,0.0001177342,0.0001197341,0.0001166366,0.6499113,0.08066127,0.03383037,0.0004520679,0.2274752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001053917,0.00008317611,0.001133719,0.000004074805,0.00001290227,0.00005846536,0.00000423451,0.9819937,0.01406079,0.002004063,0.0006214837,0.00001278899],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02060497,0.0000881769,0.9785535,0.00001983211,0.000006617123,0.00001927036,0.00002493133,0.0002825561,0.000400095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6978497,0.0002035559,0.3006585,0.00003437365,0.00003196481,0.0000856698,0.0001368194,0.00006503259,0.0009344668],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001090238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004769862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01797461214866028,"score_gpt":0.2230901260694269,"score_spread":0.2051155139207666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}