{"id":"W2126696985","doi":"10.5167/uzh-51762","title":"Effort Provision and Communication in Teams Competing over the Commons","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; McMaster University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Communication in small groups; Economic rent; Group (periodic table); Cheap talk; Commons; Microeconomics; Aggregate (composite); Economics; Group behavior; Treatment and control groups; Business; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002904199,0.00008089892,0.0001486201,0.0001048843,0.0007379099,0.0001256474,0.0004238629,0.00009278369,0.00003574882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002669726,0.00007299903,0.00002688201,0.00009947076,0.001100379,0.0001873087,0.0004269743,0.0006916806,0.00000449696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003382316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001302089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005412047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1678367,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988204,0.0002245578,0.0002593674,0.000224308,0.0001037074,0.000367607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987265,0.0007506484,0.00006305752,0.0003675141,0.00002493635,0.00006737129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002052294,0.0001076977,0.8997632,0.000005603035,0.000005829083,0.000001530561,0.01598667,0.00002092187,0.001228042,0.0175977,0.00002302705,0.06523921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001405777,0.0001095403,0.8219342,0.0001156601,0.000004540329,0.000003698151,0.108225,0.002376401,0.0005233472,0.004159306,0.06065218,0.000490347],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8691105,0.00006381267,1.811461e-8,0.001163992,0.00006912014,0.0004057426,0.000002223651,0.00001186467,0.1291728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973329,0.002081217,0.0002038187,0.00004850889,0.00003556791,0.0000831205,0.000003129092,0.00001144182,0.0002002479],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1624247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8473481,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02945461078336812,"score_gpt":0.376202175659698,"score_spread":0.3467475648763299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}