{"id":"W2126718551","doi":"10.1016/j.cor.2006.03.003","title":"The minimum weighted covering location problem with distance constraints","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Operations Research","topic":"Facility Location and Emergency Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Mathematical optimization; Facility location problem; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Consistency (knowledge bases); Dominating set; Mathematics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Theoretical computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000776649,0.0001159568,0.00008528319,0.0001788986,0.001440459,0.001069235,0.000363574,0.00002700628,0.00008174185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003140654,0.00008309165,0.00002316279,0.001114064,0.0003455701,0.0006441808,0.0001515725,0.000163337,0.0003690917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008179782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000699235,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002108897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008555576,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985185,0.00004008491,0.0002641203,0.000292206,0.0005281005,0.0003570342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987431,0.00004703703,0.00001597532,0.0003483547,0.0008318072,0.0000136998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005898421,0.00023161,0.001573722,0.0001815173,0.00004604213,0.000006626674,0.0001148476,0.2623039,0.0002063688,0.6599718,0.05158577,0.02371886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005064273,0.00002066682,0.00560065,0.00007216525,0.00000929937,0.000001359645,0.0004179832,0.8112953,0.00004183165,0.0009571755,0.1808628,0.0002143167],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1669675,0.0003193191,0.7518787,0.02181713,0.0006946103,0.002626519,0.000005892546,0.0003362009,0.05535418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952199,0.00001399843,0.001565874,0.0001982007,0.0003304347,0.000139463,0.00008636891,0.00001336773,0.002432366],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8282524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999678,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03001767224561836,"score_gpt":0.2776057595348011,"score_spread":0.2475880872891827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}