{"id":"W2126746557","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-6622.2004.tb00598.x","title":"PERHAPS EVA DOES BEAT EARNINGS—REVISITING PREVIOUS EVIDENCE","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of applied corporate finance","topic":"Financial Reporting and Valuation Research","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Economics; Stock (firearms); Accounting; Stock market; Earnings per share; Financial economics; Actuarial science; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01685484,0.000707613,0.001213884,0.003517545,0.001237436,0.005705799,0.004275721,0.00340793,0.01224468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08942434,0.0005859863,0.001272675,0.004646153,0.005592627,0.009025588,0.002710168,0.006580202,0.002583381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001779935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001810409,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01601118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01070943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942032,0.001236136,0.0008663323,0.001709749,0.001484861,0.0004997086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8189318,0.1332416,0.01708325,0.01150995,0.0164167,0.002816759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002339669,0.001523126,0.3312945,0.009524133,0.003107262,0.002333905,0.008141484,0.0004796204,0.001080041,0.09225456,0.05353353,0.4943883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003097372,0.0009976951,0.5860595,0.01441118,0.001867271,0.002391238,0.02023333,0.0009730875,0.002146182,0.08256547,0.2877542,0.0002912033],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2117849,0.458926,0.003383135,0.2081548,0.01137428,0.0001071484,0.002100046,0.00009893155,0.1040707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6958898,0.2144924,0.002388066,0.05490883,0.02428873,0.00004542951,0.001392567,0.000159523,0.006434592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01685484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08913797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06606642934707005,"score_gpt":0.2860970435992012,"score_spread":0.2200306142521311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}