{"id":"W2126779954","doi":"10.1109/tmag.2006.891006","title":"An Iterative Absorbing Boundary Condition Using Varying Element Orders","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Magnetics","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computation; Finite element method; Radar cross-section; Boundary value problem; Iterative method; Computer science; Electromagnetic field; Boundary (topology); Time domain; Computational electromagnetics; Applied mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Radar; Physics; Mathematics; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000992981,0.000651755,0.0006519634,0.0006626697,0.0006728166,0.001023275,0.001500869,0.001419845,0.004835822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00452907,0.000475623,0.0005810164,0.0004817971,0.0007757299,0.001182748,0.001382598,0.001426632,0.001478429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005885165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001219135,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002282427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002263515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991166,0.0002097761,0.00004944381,0.00008720634,0.0004591292,0.00007787748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979431,0.0009668996,0.00009916464,0.0003669692,0.0005525924,0.00007126442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004347704,0.0002228394,0.001177664,0.0002033826,0.00004121046,0.0003310905,0.000673841,0.5241255,0.1268457,0.1586665,0.005605932,0.1816716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001812949,0.0000308988,0.00006117269,0.0000129969,0.000005970057,0.00005571627,0.00001408528,0.9801022,0.0124659,0.004104787,0.003115752,0.00001231912],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.009663124,0.00004010755,0.9835162,0.00007469419,0.00004863745,0.00005305053,0.0000304736,0.0003824891,0.00619128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1657912,0.00008173913,0.8274376,0.000130497,0.00003447819,0.0001969781,0.0001152033,0.0002202774,0.005991974],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004835822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01617742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02015465203844215,"score_gpt":0.3112217367719438,"score_spread":0.2910670847335017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}