{"id":"W2126791514","doi":"10.1111/ele.12003","title":"TEASIng apart alien species risk assessments: a framework for best practices","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":309,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Alien species; Attractiveness; Risk assessment; Ecology; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental resource management; Invasive species; Computer science; Biology; Business; Psychology; Economics; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005205651,0.0003850558,0.0008238803,0.00005652318,0.0003443063,0.00009122636,0.0004710361,0.0004280962,0.04598571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004243959,0.0003349677,0.0003696028,0.0002092431,0.0003297556,0.0002785496,0.0002622552,0.0005421035,0.005682236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001490913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002164541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007151309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002716108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978464,0.0002796506,0.0004253608,0.0005278323,0.0002171749,0.000703605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970383,0.001006677,0.001408867,0.0003996514,0.000007575026,0.0001388951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004391696,0.001440759,0.04070475,0.004651642,0.001333706,0.00004852652,0.0004348306,0.000003907639,0.00002337919,0.003888823,0.2720993,0.6753264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001070316,0.00005497061,0.001900043,0.0002289674,0.001207846,0.00002187833,0.0002553787,7.324359e-7,6.246097e-7,0.00002918506,0.9958459,0.0003474244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001209389,0.9573818,0.001519045,0.00246225,0.004097283,0.002825218,0.00111024,0.000159347,0.02923542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00002893836,0.9933945,0.00233269,0.002045797,0.0004919966,0.000455778,0.0003950835,0.00005185907,0.0008033657],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7237466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1863519626131294,"score_gpt":0.4103089837777993,"score_spread":0.2239570211646699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}