{"id":"W2126809201","doi":"10.2166/wqrjc.2011.020","title":"Watershed-level analysis of exceedance frequencies for different management strategies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","keywords":"Environmental science; Watershed; Soil and Water Assessment Tool; Water quality; Tillage; Hydrology (agriculture); Watershed management; Streamflow; Engineering; Computer science; Geography; Agronomy; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003442491,0.0001605901,0.0003425768,0.0003371679,0.0003169985,0.0001256458,0.0006741476,0.00006219451,0.0006111839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000200397,0.00009418364,0.0003367169,0.0003990294,0.0005028395,0.0003897728,0.000351138,0.0002724051,0.00004284858],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002096068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009040259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006523762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001023865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996909,0.0003768032,0.0005827891,0.0003104776,0.00106323,0.000757655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991935,0.00006463752,0.00009972314,0.000350195,0.000100143,0.0001918208],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006314721,0.0007946218,0.9515477,0.0002040557,0.002188703,0.00004038783,0.0221895,0.0007004675,0.009889066,0.006025973,0.0008673649,0.004920671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009655837,0.0003862162,0.7476559,0.00003149619,0.0003592946,0.000008697171,0.007174404,0.001090624,0.02729029,0.2138308,0.0008480516,0.0003585829],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878975,0.00001673875,0.00764733,0.0001865729,0.00008760083,0.0002433121,0.00003640598,0.00001382734,0.003870716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961402,0.00008756061,0.002566026,0.00002197198,0.00003170632,0.00003509817,0.00002508607,0.00001237134,0.001079943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2078049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6692035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2817008373915342,"score_gpt":0.3881900177308463,"score_spread":0.1064891803393121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}