{"id":"W2126819751","doi":"10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.09.014","title":"Determination of the enantiomeric purity of the phytoalexins spirobrassinins by 1H NMR using chiral solvation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters","topic":"Molecular spectroscopy and chirality","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Enantiomer; Solvation; Enantiomeric excess; Proton NMR; Ethanol; Organic chemistry; High-performance liquid chromatography; Chromatography; Stereochemistry; Enantioselective synthesis; Molecule; Catalysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006160896,0.0004375056,0.0002677352,0.0003528866,0.0004375959,0.0004582271,0.000352233,0.0003452616,0.001646249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007753991,0.0002527071,0.0001865348,0.0003678034,0.0004689624,0.0003241279,0.0002415785,0.0007130661,0.0006472468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003558982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003578039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009572775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001814528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999542,0.0001136445,0.00002428007,0.00007110079,0.0001333445,0.0001156456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995674,0.0001233287,0.00006674542,0.00007593393,0.0001090758,0.0000575785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009263398,0.00001503884,0.0001390855,0.00001312642,0.00000598267,0.0000268966,0.00002151209,0.00008089346,0.9974638,0.0001776097,0.00004968166,0.001913744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007713272,0.00003929563,0.0003608287,0.000001966484,0.000004564753,0.00003761783,0.00001174397,0.0003617058,0.9986845,0.0000394556,0.000446769,0.000003900394],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.953696,0.001234206,0.03445623,0.0003711845,0.00006208836,0.00006586801,0.0009722012,0.0003337984,0.008808455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827307,0.001035433,0.01272922,0.0001664051,0.00002115383,0.00002754558,0.0009026169,0.00009857303,0.002288359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001646249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005507231,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009148911731347673,"score_gpt":0.2297714120727129,"score_spread":0.2206225003413653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}